Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores the integration of Generative AI (GenAI) into geovisualization through semi-structured interviews with 20 domain experts, revealing that while GenAI enhances data handling and rapid prototyping, it shifts key challenges from production to judgment and verification. Experts noted that as technical tasks become automated, the professional value increasingly relies on spatial reasoning, contextual interpretation, and ethical judgment. The findings emphasize the need for responsible GenAI practices that address issues of provenance, interpretability, and accountability in geovisualization, highlighting the importance of domain-specific approaches to ensure scientific validity and ethical use.
As GenAI automates routine tasks in geovisualization, the real challenge lies in navigating the new landscape of judgment and accountability.
GenAI is increasingly integrated into geovisualization, yet its broader implications for professional practice are insufficiently understood. To examine these implications, we conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 geovisualization experts. The interviews were structured around four broad analytical domains: Data, Ideation, Prototyping, and Iteration, while also encouraging participants to reflect on issues that extend beyond these activities. Our findings show that GenAI expands the capabilities of geovisualization, particularly in terms of data handling, creative exploration, and rapid prototyping, but does not simply remove existing constraints. Instead, key bottlenecks are shifting from production to judgment and verification. As routine technical tasks become more automated, professional value increasingly depends on spatial reasoning, contextual interpretation, aesthetic and ethical judgment, and the ability to assess whether AI-generated outputs are appropriate for use. At the same time, GenAI introduces new challenges regarding provenance, interpretability, and accountability, raising questions about how responsibility should be distributed across models, developers, practitioners, institutions, and users. These shifts are particularly significant in geovisualization because spatial representations are constrained by geographic reality and must balance scientific validity, visual expression, and technical implementation. We therefore argue that responsible GenAI in geovisualization requires domain-specific approaches to spatial validation, provenance, uncertainty communication, human oversight, and accountable use. This study provides an expert-grounded perspective on how GenAI is reconfiguring geovisualization as a practice of spatial knowledge production. It also identifies implications for future professional practice, education, system design, and governance.
