Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates the phenomenon of "catastrophic remembering" in agentic coding READMEs, where instructions accumulate indefinitely due to the high cost of deleting them without risking correctness. Analyzing 247,694 instruction lifetimes across 1,867 repositories, the authors find that agentic prompts grow significantly over time, with older instructions becoming increasingly resistant to deletion. They propose that incorporating prompt comments can effectively mitigate this growth, demonstrating a reduction of excess instructions by 99.3% and improving instruction-following performance by up to 23.1%.
Catastrophic remembering leads to an explosive growth of agentic prompts, but simple prompt comments can reverse this trend and enhance performance dramatically.
Agentic coding READMEs like CLAUDE.md grow without bound in real repositories, stopping only when the repository retires or someone rewrites the file wholesale. We trace this to imperfect recall: appending an instruction is always cheap, but once an instruction's rationale is gone, deleting it without risking a correctness regression costs O(2^|D|) in a prompt of |D| instructions. We name the resulting divergence catastrophic remembering, the inverse of catastrophic forgetting around which continual learning is organized. First, we characterize this phenomenon across 247,694 instruction lifetimes in 1,867 repositories: agentic prompts grow without bound, more than tripling over their lifetime (+226%), gaining +4.9 net instructions every commit; further, the older an instruction gets, the less likely it is to be deleted (log-hazard -0.032/commit). Then, we show that prompt comments can halt the growth: inverting IFEval yields verifiable worlds whose optimal prompts are known, and there comments encoding latent reasoning remove 99.3% of excess instructions (+211.3% to +1.4%). Finally, applying the same inversion to WildIFEval, we show that prompt comments can improve real-world agentic instruction-following by up to 23.1%. If English is the new code, why don't we have comments yet?
