Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the OpenScore String Quartet for Optical Music Recognition (OSSQ-OMR), the first dataset specifically designed for multi-part optical music recognition, addressing a significant gap in the field. The dataset comprises 24,544 system images and 98,172 staff images from 116 string quartet scores, paired with their original scanned editions and transcriptions in multiple formats. Benchmark evaluations of two OMR models reveal that encoding and segmentation choices significantly impact performance, with LSTM models outperforming Transformer models on scanned inputs by a factor of 2.6.
Multi-part optical music recognition is revolutionized with the OSSQ-OMR dataset, revealing that LSTM models can outperform Transformers by 2.6 times on scanned scores.
Optical music recognition (OMR) transcribes music scores into digital formats. While the field has advanced significantly on monophonic and piano-form scores, multi-part score transcription remains underexplored, largely due to the absence of a suitable dataset. We introduce OpenScore String Quartet for Optical Music Recognition (OSSQ-OMR), the first dataset dedicated to multi-part OMR. Built on the OpenScore String Quartet corpus, OSSQ-OMR pairs digitally encoded scores with their original scanned editions from IMSLP, with all images visually aligned to their transcriptions. The dataset is released with score images at system and staff levels, and paired transcriptions in three encoding formats: Extended Linearized MusicXML (LMXE), **kern, and ABC. In total, OSSQ-OMR contains 24,544 system images and 98,172 staff images drawn from 116 string quartet scores. We accompany the dataset with a benchmark protocol and baseline results from two representative OMR models, evaluated across four random score-level splits with mutually exclusive test sets. Baselines reach OMR-NED as low as 3.6% on synthetic and 5.9% on scanned inputs; results reveal substantial effects of encoding and segmentation choices, with the LSTM-based baseline degrading on scanned inputs roughly 2.6 times less than the Transformer-based baseline.
