Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces AD2-Bench, a novel benchmark that employs a Hierarchical Visual Diagnosis framework to dissect the reasoning processes of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in complex urban scenes. By identifying key failure modes such as Spatial Ambiguity and Semantic Uncertainty, the authors highlight the critical role of accurate evidence acquisition in multimodal reasoning. The proposed Evidence-grounded Visual Reasoning (EGVOR) method enhances reasoning stability by generating structured Evidence Atoms, leading to significant improvements in cognitive reliability under adverse conditions.
Robust multimodal reasoning hinges on explicit evidence acquisition, with EGVOR achieving substantial gains in cognitive reliability by addressing key failure modes.
While Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate impressive performance in benign scenarios, their cognitive reliability deteriorates significantly in complex scenes under adverse conditions. In these settings, models often rely on implicit inference without sufficient visual evidence, leading to a disconnect between perception and reasoning. Meanwhile, existing outcome-oriented benchmarks evaluate only final predictions and fail to diagnose failures in the underlying reasoning process. To address this gap, the authors propose AD2-Bench, which introduces a Hierarchical Visual Diagnosis framework that decomposes reasoning into a structured Chain of Evidence (CoE). This fine-grained diagnosis reveals that robust multimodal reasoning fundamentally depends on accurate evidence acquisition. Building on this perspective, the authors formulate reasoning from a probabilistic viewpoint and identify two primary causes of reasoning failure: Spatial Ambiguity, where models fail to distinguish target objects from background clutter, resulting in localization errors; and Semantic Uncertainty, where degraded visual features lead to incorrect semantic interpretation, resulting in understanding errors. To overcome these evidence deficiencies, they further propose Evidence-grounded Visual Reasoning (EGVOR), which replaces implicit reasoning with the explicit generation of Evidence Atoms - structured spatial-semantic triplets that enforce tight alignment between localization and semantic understanding. The model is trained through a hierarchical curriculum that progresses from reflective supervision construction to reinforcement learning, where reducing reasoning variance is explicitly rewarded. Extensive experiments demonstrate that EGVOR substantially improves reasoning stability under adverse conditions, providing a more robust framework for trustworthy multimodal cognition.
