Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces VibeLifeBench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the proactive and persistent capabilities of large language model (LLM) agents in dynamic, long-horizon tasks that reflect real-life scenarios. Unlike traditional evaluations that focus on short, static requests, VibeLifeBench encompasses 200 tasks across ten everyday-life domains, requiring agents to autonomously manage evolving situations over weeks. The evaluation reveals that current LLM agents perform poorly, highlighting a significant gap in their ability to assist effectively in real-world contexts.
Current LLM agents struggle to keep pace with the complexities of real-life assistance, scoring low on a benchmark designed to test their proactive and persistent capabilities.
Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly deployed as personal assistants. Existing evaluations, however, mostly use short, self-contained requests in static environments. Everyday life assistance is different. A task runs for weeks rather than minutes. The world keeps changing while the agent is not being prompted. Many constraints are never stated outright. An agent that merely answers the request in front of it will fail at such a task. What is needed instead is an agent that stays proactive and consistent. It decides on its own when to act, when to ask, and when to stay silent. It notices changes that nobody announced. It keeps one plan coherent from the first day to the last. No current benchmark measures this. We introduce VibeLifeBench, a benchmark of 200 long-horizon tasks across ten everyday-life domains. Each task is a scripted multi-week timeline in a simulated world of 22 mock services. The world advances on its own clock, and many of its changes are silent, so only an agent that re-inspects the world discovers them. Every task is graded by fine-grained, weighted checks that read only what the agent actually left behind, covering the end state, the timeliness of its actions, and whether it upheld the implicit constraints. We evaluate seven frontier models. All of them score low, which shows how far current agents are from assisting with real life. We will open-source all tasks, environments, and the evaluation framework.
