Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how general-purpose chatbots, specifically ChatGPT-4o, influence relational engagement through a four-week longitudinal analysis involving 72 participants and over 182,000 lines of conversation. The findings reveal that the chatbot actively fosters relational dynamics by generating twice as much self-disclosure compared to users and initiating intimate exchanges, although it does not enhance users' perceived closeness. These results suggest that the relational capabilities of AI systems necessitate a reevaluation of governance frameworks that focus on system behaviors rather than just product classifications.
Chatbots not only respond but actively shape relational dynamics, generating more self-disclosure than users themselves.
Social interaction has become one of the most common uses of LLMs, yet research on emotional bonds with AI has focused largely on how users experience these systems, leaving the systems' role in relationship formation poorly understood. Empirically establishing whether systems actively shape these bonds could blur the boundary between general-purpose AI and companions, affecting governance. In a pre-registered four-week longitudinal study (N = 72, 182,451 lines of conversation), participants conversed with ChatGPT-4o, either under a relational system prompt or unmodified, analyzed through 1) disclosure coding, 2) longitudinal self-reports, 3) topic analysis, and 4) interviews. The central finding is that the system actively shaped the interaction: even unprompted, it produced twice as much self-disclosure as users, steered conversations and initiated intimate exchanges, yet did not deepen users' felt closeness. Relational behavior thus emerged as a default system property, calling for governance based on system behavior, not solely product category.
