Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the "Grip on LLMs" framework, a comprehensive evaluation suite tailored for assessing large language models (LLMs) in Dutch governmental contexts, developed through collaboration with domain experts. The framework identifies six critical evaluation dimensions鈥攆actuality, honesty, social bias, energy consumption, cost, and training data transparency鈥攁nd operationalizes them into a benchmark suite for over 30 multilingual and Dutch-specific models. Key findings indicate that trade-offs are inherent in model selection, with high quality correlating with increased environmental and financial costs, and that factuality and honesty are governed by distinct properties, challenging the assumption that one guarantees the other.
No single large language model can meet all governmental evaluation criteria, revealing critical trade-offs between quality, cost, and bias.
Large language models are increasingly being deployed in governmental settings, yet few existing evaluation frameworks jointly reflect the values of public administration and the linguistic requirements of non-English contexts. We present the"Grip on LLMs"framework, a systematic evaluation suite for Dutch governmental use developed in collaboration with domain experts from a major Dutch municipal organisation. Through an advisory board process, user research, and a survey of the users of a civil-servant chatbot, we identify six evaluation dimensions (factuality, honesty, social bias, energy consumption, cost, and training data transparency) and operationalise them into a benchmark suite covering more than 30 multilingual and Dutch-specific models. Our results reveal that no single model excels across all dimensions, and that trade-offs are unavoidable: higher quality consistently comes at greater environmental impact and financial cost, while bias remains largely independent of both. We further find that factuality (whether a model answers correctly) and honesty (whether a model acknowledges what it does not know) are governed by distinct properties, with high factuality not implying high honesty. To make these findings actionable for non-technical audiences, we release a publicly accessible, user-friendly model overview designed for the full range of stakeholders involved in governmental LLM selection, from engineers to policymakers.
