Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study quantitatively compares audio descriptions of movies from the UK and the US, revealing significant differences in language use and narrative techniques. By analyzing a corpus of 206 films, the authors tested specific hypotheses related to lexicon, grammatical structures, and the timing of descriptions in relation to dialogue and music. The findings provide robust evidence for regional variations in audio description practices, which are crucial for enhancing accessibility for blind and visually impaired audiences.
British and American audio descriptions differ significantly in language and narrative style, impacting how visually impaired viewers experience films.
Narrating the visual component of movies is known as audio description. It is a narrative technique designed to enable blind and visually impaired individuals to follow the story. However, it is far more constrained than most narratives: the descriptions not only need to convey the story in the movie, but they must also fit into gaps between dialogue and they need to conform to guidelines that exist in each region. In this work, we compare audio description created in the United Kingdom against audio description created in the United States. We use guidelines written for these two regions, alongside the impressions from a practitioner in the field, to motivate specific hypotheses about the differences. We test these hypotheses against our pre-existing corpus, which provides both human-authored American and British audio description for each of 206 movies. Results provide quantitative evidence to uphold all tested hypotheses, including differences in lexicon, the use of the progressive aspect, the use of passive constructions, the use of subjective adjectives and modifiers, when characters are named, how scenes are cued, and degree of overlap with movie dialogue and music. Our work offers a quantitative lens into the narrative technique of audio description.
