Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces TriView-YOLO, a novel multi-view YOLOv12 detector specifically designed for detecting subsurface cavities in challenging soft, high-water-content soils using Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR). By integrating three co-registered views into a 9-channel input, the model effectively mitigates the signal attenuation caused by water-saturated soil, achieving a mean Average Precision (mAP50) of 0.558 on a unique test set derived from Bangkok's metropolitan road surveys. The findings underscore the model's robustness in a previously unaddressed context, highlighting the importance of multi-view data fusion in enhancing GPR cavity detection performance.
TriView-YOLO achieves a surprising mAP50 of 0.558 in detecting subsurface cavities in water-saturated soils, a feat no prior deep learning model has tackled effectively.
Automated detection of subsurface cavities from Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) is most difficult in soft, high-water-content ground, where conductive, water-saturated soil attenuates the signal and degrades cavity reflections, yet this is also the condition under which cavities most readily form. This paper proposes TriView-YOLO, a multi-view YOLOv12 detector for road cavity screening in such ground. Three co-registered views (longitudinal B-scan, horizontal C-scan, and cross-section B-scan) form a 9-channel input fused by a TripleInputConv layer that replaces the YOLOv12 stem; the rest of the network is unchanged, and bounding boxes are required on the longitudinal view only. Training used 1,600 expert-verified field samples, principally metropolitan road surveys of Bangkok, Thailand, acquired with a vehicle-mounted multichannel three-dimensional GPR mobile mapping system, with surveys over the firmer subgrades of Japan added to training and validation only. The test set comes exclusively from the Bangkok surveys, over soft marine clay with 80-140% water content and a water table at 1-2 m depth, a ground condition for which no dedicated deep learning cavity-detection evaluation has been reported. On this unaugmented, field-only test set, split randomly within surveys, the proposed model attains mAP50 of 0.558 +/- 0.028 over three seeds at 23.6 GFLOPs and 3.1 ms per image. Ablations show that removing the auxiliary views lowers mAP50 and recall, whereas public and synthetic training images, DINOv3 features, larger model scale, and COCO pretraining bring no gain.