Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a novel approach for hidden-target localization using range-bearing packets from an unknown-pose relay beacon, leveraging the vehicle's known trajectory without direct target observation. The authors establish that two distinct vehicle-relative observations can uniquely determine the relay's yaw and position, significantly reducing calibration ambiguity. In Monte Carlo evaluations, their estimator achieves a remarkable 5.5 mm RMSE, outperforming traditional methods and demonstrating robustness against outlier corruption.
Achieving millimeter-level accuracy in hidden-target localization without direct target observation could revolutionize autonomous navigation systems.
This paper studies hidden-target localization from range-bearing packets reported by a relay beacon whose global position and yaw are unknown. The vehicle knows its own trajectory but never directly senses the target; the relay packet contains only local-frame range and bearing to the vehicle and to the hidden target. Unlike bearing-only network localization, relative-frame localization, and target-enclosing control, the target is neither directly observed in the vehicle frame nor treated as a node in a relative-sensing graph. The main result characterizes the minimal motion that removes the resulting calibration ambiguity: one vehicle pose leaves a continuous yaw/translation/target gauge, whereas two distinct vehicle-relative observations from one unknown-pose relay constructively determine relay yaw (modulo 2 pi), relay position, and the anchored target in the noiseless case. A local rank corollary, a shared-target multi-beacon extension, and a trajectory-spread conditioning lemma connect relay self-calibration to finite-window excitation and native range-bearing estimation. In Monte Carlo evaluation the estimator recovers the hidden target with 5.5 mm RMSE, five times below the 30 mm per-packet range noise and thirteen times more accurate than a naive EKF baseline; it converges to the same accuracy from 2 m target offsets and 2.4 rad yaw errors, and Huber weighting preserves millimeter accuracy under 10% outlier corruption that drops the unprotected estimator to a 0.10 success rate. Trajectory spread predicts estimator quality: the two weakly excited trajectories carry condition numbers above 100 with success rates of 0.82 and 0.70, while every well-excited trajectory attains full success.
