Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper explores the evolution of continual learning (CL) by shifting the focus from traditional parameter-centric mechanisms to a more holistic system-level adaptation approach. It introduces a tri-axial framework that categorizes CL advancements across three dimensions: When, How, and Where learning occurs, encompassing various learning paradigms such as on-policy learning and test-time training. The findings highlight the need for a broader understanding of CL that incorporates external components and dynamic interactions, paving the way for more adaptable and capable AI systems.
The shift from parameter-centric to system-level adaptation in continual learning could redefine how we build and interact with AI models.
Classical continual learning (CL) has primarily focused on enabling models to update and retain knowledge through parameter-centric mechanisms, e.g., training strategies, architectural designs, and weight adaptation. However, emerging paradigms are reshaping the scope of CL beyond this traditional model adaptation view. For instance, on-policy learning broadens the space of update mechanisms; test-time training extends CL from the training phase to inference; and external harness components such as memory, skill libraries, and interaction protocols extend the evolutionary boundaries of model capabilities far beyond the static parameter space. Collectively, these developments indicate a transition from parameter-centric learning toward system-level adaptation. To characterize this transition, we examine the evolution of continual learning through three dimensions: When, How, and Where learning occurs. The How dimension encompasses off-policy, on-policy, and beyond-gradient optimization mechanics. The When dimension captures evolution across pre-training, post-training, and inference-time stages. The Where dimension delineates updates occurring within internal parameters versus external structural constraints. Anchored by this tri-axial framework, we systematically survey representative methods, trace the ongoing transition of continual learning, and discuss the key challenges, broader implications, and future directions arising from this paradigm shift.
