Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
CMU ML
MIT CSAILCornellMarketing and Management CommunicationsSC Johnson School of BusinessAug 6, 2026arXiv:2608.06151This study investigates the effectiveness of conversational dialogues with a large language model (LLM) in reducing belief in conspiracy theories during unfolding crises, specifically following the assassination attempts on Donald Trump and Charlie Kirk. In two experiments involving a total of 1,507 U.S. adults, participants who engaged in multi-turn conversations with the LLM exhibited significantly lower conspiracy beliefs compared to those in control groups. Notably, the LLM's impact extended beyond immediate beliefs, influencing participants' views on unrelated conspiracies for up to two months post-intervention, suggesting a promising avenue for addressing misinformation in real-time.
Engaging with an LLM can significantly diminish belief in conspiracy theories during crises, with effects lasting well beyond the initial interaction.
The emergence of conspiracy theories in the wake of major events is a significant societal challenge. Here we test whether conversational dialogues with a large language model (LLM) can reduce belief in immediately unfolding conspiracies. In experiments conducted in the days following the July 2024 assassination attempt on Donald Trump and the September 2025 assassination of Charlie Kirk, U.S. adults (Experiment 1: N = 472; Experiment 2: N = 1035) holding conspiratorial views about the crisis event engaged in a multi-turn conversation with an LLM prompted to reduce their conspiracy belief. Compared to control participants who either discussed an irrelevant topic with an LLM or viewed a static fact sheet, participants in the LLM treatment showed significantly reduced conspiracy beliefs in both experiments. We also found evidence of downstream effects of the LLM treatment, observing reduced belief in different conspiracies one to two months later in the wake of subsequent crisis events. These results shed light on the psychology of emerging conspiracies and highlight the potential for scalable, cognitively-focused interventions to counteract misinformation in the immediate aftermath of high-profile societal events.
