Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper refines the requirements for self-explainable systems by proposing unified definitions and structured explainability criteria based on a comprehensive analysis of existing frameworks. The authors emphasize the importance of incorporating explanation goodness and correctness into these definitions, addressing a critical gap in the current standards landscape. Their work lays the groundwork for developing formal standards that can enhance the transparency and accountability of complex autonomous systems, which is increasingly demanded by regulatory bodies like the EU and IEEE.
A unified taxonomy for self-explainable systems could revolutionize how we certify and audit AI transparency in compliance with emerging regulations.
Autonomous and software-intensive systems have been growing in occurrence, complexity, and assumed responsibility. Due to the high complexity of these systems, properties like transparency and explainability must be a focus of investigation. To date, no universally applicable definition and guide for the development of (self-)explainable systems exists. A need for explainability standards has already been recognized in the EU AI Act and the IEEE Transparency Standard 7001-2021. To address this need, we propose unified definitions in explainability based on an analysis and combination of existing definitions. Additionally, we present structured explainability requirements that are necessary to build (self-)explainable systems. By analysing the resulting taxonomy, we propose the incorporation of explanation goodness and thus correctness of explanations into the unified definitions. With our approach, we support the development of formal standards for (self-)explainable systems. Establishing such a uniform taxonomy also is a beneficial step towards certifying or auditing explainable systems.
