Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces the concept of Agentic Integrated Sensing and Communication (AISAC), transforming traditional ISAC into a goal-driven, intelligent system through a six-stage closed-loop framework. By synthesizing existing literature across various domains such as multimodal intelligence and reinforcement learning, the authors highlight a significant gap in agentic maturity, revealing that current systems rarely meet more than one or two of the proposed evaluation criteria. The findings underscore critical challenges in achieving effective agentic AI, particularly in areas like predictive modeling and real-time interaction, which are essential for advancing intelligent systems in communication networks.
Current agentic AI systems fall short, with none demonstrating more than two out of nine critical maturity criteria, exposing a significant gap in their capabilities.
Agentic artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming Integrated Sensing and Communication (ISAC) from a function-oriented physical-layer technology into a goal-driven, closed-loop intelligent system, a paradigm we term AISAC. Existing work on learning-based sensing, resource allocation, reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RIS), edge intelligence, multi-agent coordination, and resilient networking has developed largely in isolation. This survey unifies the literature within a six-stage closed-loop framework comprising observation, contextualization, reasoning and prediction, planning and orchestration, execution and collaboration, and feedback and resilience. It also introduces five levels of agentic maturity, ranging from physical-layer primitives to fully closed-loop agentic ISAC. We use this framework to review advances in multimodal intelligence, large language models, reinforcement learning, federated learning, RIS-assisted control, Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) and vehicular networks, and AI-native network management, and analyze privacy, security, resilience, and sustainability as cross-cutting requirements of the full perception-reasoning-action loop. An audit of representative studies against nine agentic-specific evaluation criteria shows that no system reports more than one or two of them, exposing a gap between claimed and demonstrated agentic maturity. We identify open challenges in physical-to-semantic grounding, predictive world models, real-time agent-PHY interaction, safe tool use, heterogeneous multi-agent collaboration, benchmarking, and resource-efficient autonomy.
