Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces CoPlan, a novel interface that enhances AI-supported care planning by enabling a multi-agent workflow where specialized AI agents generate interventions alongside arguments for and against them. This approach allows human care planners to actively engage in the decision-making process, ensuring that care plans are adaptable and aligned with clinical judgment and patient values. The results demonstrate that CoPlan effectively facilitates collaborative care planning while maintaining accountability and transparency in the decision-making process.
CoPlan empowers clinicians and patients to collaboratively shape care plans, ensuring that AI recommendations are not just accepted but actively contested and refined.
AI-supported care planning can help clinicians, patients, caregivers, and care teams coordinate complex decisions across clinical, functional, psychosocial, and environmental needs. However, many AI systems present recommendations as fixed outputs, limiting stakeholders'ability to inspect, challenge, and revise plans when they conflict with clinical judgment, patient values, or real-world feasibility. We present CoPlan - a Co-Intelligent and Contestable Interface for Human-AI Care Planning. CoPlan uses a multi-agent workflow in which specialized AI agents generate candidate interventions and supporting or challenging arguments, while human care planners can accept, reject, modify, or add arguments before final plan generation. Through this design, CoPlan combines co-intelligence, in which humans and AI agents contribute complementary expertise, with contestability, where recommendations remain open to inspection, revision, and justification. We demonstrate CoPlan in an aging-in-place care planning scenario. The system supports adaptive care team recruitment, role-based argument review, final care plan generation, and practical follow-up through scheduling agents. This work contributes a contestable care planning interface and a design framing for trustworthy human-AI care planning that preserves human agency and clinical accountability.
