Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study analyzes 4.5 million tweets and 59,170 parliamentary speeches from German political elites between 2015 and 2025 to examine shifts in rhetorical commitments to truth amid the rise of populist actors. The findings reveal a significant increase in intuition-based rhetoric, particularly following the parliamentary entry of the far-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) in 2017, which correlates with a marked decline in evidence-based discourse across political parties. Notably, right-leaning actors consistently exhibit the lowest Evidence Minus Intuition (EMI) scores, highlighting a troubling trend in elite communication that undermines democratic deliberation.
The rise of the far-right in Germany has led to a dramatic shift towards intuition-based rhetoric among political elites, threatening the integrity of democratic discourse.
The spread of misinformation is widely perceived as a threat to democratic deliberation, yet how political elites'rhetorical commitments to truth shift alongside the rise of populist actors remains poorly understood. Analysing 4.5 million tweets and 59,170 parliamentary speeches by German political elites between 2015 and 2025, we measure evidence-based and intuition-based rhetoric using a validated distributed dictionary representation. Across both arenas, intuition-based language has become more prominent, and right-leaning actors consistently exhibit the lowest Evidence Minus Intuition (EMI) scores. The parliamentary entry of the extreme-right Alternative for Germany (AfD) in 2017 coincides with sharp downward shifts in EMI across the broader chamber, while a more gradual decline is observed on Twitter. These findings document an association between far-right visibility and a changing approach to truth in elite discourse in a multiparty European democracy.
