Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
MIT CSAIL
NVIDIA
Stanford HAIAffiliation:Independent ResearcherJiangxi Arts & Ceramics TechnologyUniversiti Sains MalaysiaUSTCWharton SchoolAug 4, 2026arXiv:2608.04205MatrAIx introduces a scalable evaluation framework for AI systems using 8.3 billion persona agents that simulate diverse user interactions across multiple environments. This infrastructure allows for the assessment of AI performance through a wide range of tasks and user behaviors, revealing insights into how preferences and decisions vary among different personas. Key findings show that the simulated personas effectively adhere to behavioral attributes, with a 91.5% success rate in expressing or suppressing declared behaviors during evaluations.
Simulating 8.3 billion diverse personas reveals nuanced user interactions that traditional evaluations miss, transforming how we assess AI systems.
Human evaluation of AI systems and digital products is costly, slow, and difficult to scale. Offline evaluations are more scalable but often abstract away human diversity and interactive behavior. We therefore introduce MatrAIx, a population-scale simulated-user evaluation infrastructure for testing AI systems and digital products with heterogeneous users. MatrAIx has three core components: First, Persona 8B contains 8.3 billion persona records represented by 1,290 categorical dimensions. Records are either sampled from a dependency graph that preserves correlated attributes or derived from human-authored profiles. We release a quality-filtered coreset of approximately 1 million personas, comprising 599,847 human-grounded and 400,000 synthetic records. Second, the MatrAIx Playground provides four environments in which diverse users evaluate and interact with digital products: Survey, AI Chatbot, Web, and App. Third, MatrAIx provides 1,010 application tasks spanning more than 25 domains, including Commerce, Software, Finance, and Healthcare. We conducted 18,189 evaluation trials across eight representative tasks. Persona agents were powered by three LLMs: Claude Opus 4.8, GPT 5.5, and Claude Haiku 4.5. The resulting feedback captures how decisions and preferences vary across persona backgrounds, including hesitation after a price increase, willingness to continue after an AI assistant fails, and latency tolerance. We conducted two main validation studies: First, a 400-trial controlled study evaluated persona adherence across ten behavioral attributes and all four environments. The declared behavior was expressed or correctly suppressed in 366 trials (91.5%). Second, human and LLM judges evaluated the extraction quality of human-grounded personas. Overall, MatrAIx provides an end-to-end infrastructure for evaluating AI systems and digital products with diverse simulated human users.
