Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper systematically evaluates the robustness of zero-shot coordination (ZSC) algorithms, specifically focusing on Other-Play, by employing a novel evaluation scheme called cross-implementation cross-play. The authors highlight that previous evaluations often relied on a single implementation across different random seeds, which may not accurately reflect real-world variability. Their findings indicate that the standard ZSC evaluation serves as a reasonable proxy for assessing performance across diverse implementations, suggesting a level of robustness in the algorithm's design.
Other-Play's performance remains stable across varied implementations, challenging the notion that single-seed evaluations capture the full picture of zero-shot coordination robustness.
AI agents deployed in real-world settings must be capable of coordinating with humans and other AI agents they have not encountered before. Zero-shot coordination (ZSC) algorithms aim to achieve this by specifying high-level learning rules such that independently engineered agents can coordinate with each other at test time. Rigorous evaluation of ZSC algorithms remains difficult: ideally, multiple independent implementations of each proposed algorithm must be used, reflecting the variation that arises when independent parties interpret and implement the same specification. In practice, however, ZSC algorithms have almost exclusively been evaluated using a single implementation trained across different random seeds, with only a handful of works additionally varying the neural network architecture. This leaves open questions about robustness to specification ambiguities and implementation details. In this work, we provide the first systematic evaluation of this robustness. We introduce a new evaluation scheme, cross-implementation cross-play, varying implementation details that prior work has shown to affect the performance of multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) algorithms, and we evaluate Other-Play, a popular ZSC algorithm, with this scheme. Our findings are encouraging and suggest that, for Other-Play, the standard ZSC evaluation is, in fact, a reasonable proxy for this more thorough cross-implementation evaluation.
