Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper analyzes the contrasting effects of Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) on multi-task reasoning in large language models (LLMs). The authors identify that SFT encounters severe task conflicts during multi-stage training, while RL achieves stable task coexistence due to its ability to induce sparse and approximately orthogonal updates. Their theoretical framework reveals that SFT's interference is norm-limited, whereas RL's is variance-limited, leading to the development of Parallel-RL, which enhances training efficiency and flexibility.
SFT leads to task conflicts that can cripple multi-task learning, while RL's variance-limited updates enable seamless task coexistence.
Supervised Fine-Tuning (SFT) and Reinforcement Learning (RL) exhibit fundamentally different behaviors in enhancing multi-task reasoning for large language models (LLMs). Our preliminary experiments revealed a phenomenon: SFT suffers from severe task conflicts under multi-stage training, whereas RL enables stable coexistence across diverse tasks. Empirically, we trace this to the parameter level, observing that RL induces sparse and approximately orthogonal updates across tasks. We provide a theoretical explanation for this mechanism by analyzing multi-task gradient interference. Our results reveal a distinction: interference in SFT is norm-limited, scaling with the absolute gradient magnitude, whereas interference in RL is variance-limited, bounded by the gradient variance induced by advantage normalization and on-policy optimization. This small variance bound yields near-orthogonal optimization directions across tasks. Leveraging this insight, we propose Parallel-RL, a paradigm that decouples multi-task training, significantly improving efficiency and flexibility.
Tsinghua AI