Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how the adoption of AI-assisted development tools influences social dynamics within software engineering teams, particularly focusing on community smells鈥攕ocio-technical anti-patterns that indicate coordination and communication breakdowns. Utilizing Transactive Memory Systems (TMS) theory, the authors analyze survey data from 152 software professionals to reveal that AI adoption can either mitigate or exacerbate community smells depending on the nature of the work being performed. Specifically, in specialization tasks, AI enhances peer knowledge-sharing, leading to fewer community smells, while in coordination tasks, AI improves communication quality without replacing human interactions.
AI adoption can either reduce or exacerbate community smells in software teams, depending on whether the work is specialized or coordinated.
Context: The growing adoption of AI-assisted development tools is changing how software teams collaborate, share knowledge, and coordinate, yet its consequences for team social dynamics remain largely unexplored. Gap: It is unclear whether AI adoption is associated with an increase or reduction in community smells,socio-technical anti-patterns reflecting coordination and communication breakdowns,and through which mechanisms. Method: Grounded in Transactive Memory Systems (TMS) theory, we validate instruments for HumanAI and HumanHuman interaction along two TMS dimensions, Specialization and Coordination, and test five PLS-SEM models on survey data from 152 software professionals using AI tools. Community smell constructs were derived from the literature and validated through expert surveys and factor analysis. Results: AI adoption relates to community smells not in a single way, but through mechanisms depending on the work. In specialization work, AI is associated with higher knowledge-sharing peer interaction, which is in turn associated with fewer smells. In coordination work, AI is directly associated with higher communication quality, complementing rather than replacing human interaction. Contributions: We provide an empirically validated, TMS-grounded model showing that the AIcommunity-smell relationship is contingent on the type of collaboration, with a reusable instrument and evidence-based implications for research and practice.
