Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces REAlign, a reranking framework designed to enhance compositional e-commerce queries by explicitly aligning typed query requirements with visible evidence. By distinguishing between satisfied, violated, and unsupported conditions, REAlign optimizes rankings to prioritize feasible products while maintaining relevance and minimizing violations. Experiments demonstrate that REAlign outperforms existing supervised and policy-optimization methods, achieving better rankings with fewer violations and greater gains at shallow ranks.
REAlign significantly reduces violations in top-ranked e-commerce products by explicitly aligning query requirements with evidence, outperforming traditional rerankers.
Compositional e-commerce queries express multiple requirements that must hold jointly, yet existing rerankers collapse these constraints into aggregate relevance and often promote topical near misses over feasible products. In this paper, we introduce REAlign, a novel requirement-evidence-aligned reranking framework that explicitly connects typed query requirements with visible evidence. REAlign distinguishes satisfied, violated, and unsupported conditions, constructs requirement-targeted contrasts that expose failure modes, and optimizes duplicate-free partial rankings through Requirement-Aware Group-Relative Policy Optimization. Its list utility preserves relevance while incorporating requirement satisfaction, evidence support, material violations, and output validity. Experiments on two fixed-pool e-commerce benchmarks show consistent improvements over strong supervised and policy-optimization baselines under matched training budgets, with fewer violations among top-ranked candidates and larger gains at shallow ranks. Controlled ablations confirm the complementary value of requirement modeling, evidence grounding, and decomposed optimization.
