Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates how open-source LLMs represent and decode mythological knowledge across different cultures, revealing that while these models can reliably identify figures from dominant mythologies, they struggle with less-represented traditions. Using techniques such as linear probing and activation patching on 18 models, the authors find that cultural distinctions are present in the model's representations but are lost during the decoding process, particularly influenced by the language of the prompt. The findings indicate that the decoder's limitations, rather than the representation itself, lead to the underperformance in recognizing culturally-specific tokens, emphasizing the need for improved language-conditioned readout mechanisms.
Cultural representation in LLMs is strong, but the decoding process fails to leverage this knowledge, leading to significant biases in mythological understanding.
Open-source LLMs reliably name Zeus, Jupiter, and Thor, but recover their counterparts in less-represented traditions like Finnish, Slavic, Egyptian, or Chinese mythology far less consistently. We ask where inside the model this cultural default is produced. On a parallel cross-cultural substrate of Thompson-motif entities, we instrument 18 open-source LLMs from 8 architecture families with linear probing, logit lens, activation patching, and output extraction. The residual stream cleanly distinguishes cultures, well above a name-string baseline, yet the decoder collapses culturally-specific tokens onto dominant-tradition ones. The failure is at readout, not at representation. Asking the same question in the target culture's native language versus English produces failures that cluster within language but decouple across language: the decoder is gated on prompt language. We release a per-entity (probe, output) decomposition framework, a citation-anchored cross-cultural ground truth, a within- versus cross-mode correlation test for language-conditioned readout, and per-entity predictions for all 18 models.
