Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces ScrambleToolBench, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate autonomous agents' ability to discover and adapt to unfamiliar tool behaviors through trial-and-error interaction in dynamic environments. By removing semantic cues and enforcing a continuous task curriculum, the benchmark challenges agents to navigate mapping drift and stochastic failures without relying on prior knowledge. The findings reveal that while agents can initially discover tool behaviors, they struggle with robust adaptation and often resort to inefficient exhaustive search strategies when faced with structural changes, indicating a significant gap in their reasoning capabilities.
Agents can discover tool behaviors but fail to adapt effectively, often resorting to inefficient exhaustive searches in dynamic environments.
To operate robustly in open-world environments, autonomous agents should be able to infer the behavior of unfamiliar systems through interaction alone, even in the absence of documentation. However, existing tool-use benchmarks expose semantic tool schemas in static environments, allowing agents to rely on prior knowledge rather than autonomous discovery. To address this limitation, we introduce ScrambleToolBench, an interactive terminal benchmark designed to isolate behavioral reasoning. By removing semantic cues and enforcing a continuous task curriculum, the benchmark requires agents to uncover hidden tool behaviors entirely through trial-and-error interaction. The benchmark further introduces dynamic challenges, including mapping drift, stochastic action failures, and temporal execution windows, to evaluate whether agents can revise and adapt their hypotheses as the environment changes. Our evaluation of state-of-the-art language models reveals that successful initial discovery does not translate into robust adaptation. When faced with structural changes such as mapping drift, agents fail to use deductive strategies such as cycle tracing, and instead exhibit belief inertia or fall back to exhaustive search. Increasing test-time reasoning only amplifies this expensive brute-force search rather than enabling deductive recovery. While equipping agents with persistent memory reduces compounding errors, they remain unable to efficiently infer structural changes, highlighting a gap in current agent reasoning.
