Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study addresses the challenge of cognitive decision-making in automatic modulation classification by introducing a cross-fitted residual utility framework that allows a cognitive receiver to override default predictions based on heterogeneous evidence. By employing a structured KAN-Fourier classifier for default probability and learning candidate-specific residual utility from out-of-fold predictions, the authors achieve notable improvements in classification accuracy across multiple datasets. The results demonstrate that the proposed evidence-and-action policy consistently outperforms alternative meta-learning approaches, particularly under various stress test conditions.
A novel cognitive decision policy boosts automatic modulation classification accuracy by over 3% while effectively managing heterogeneous evidence.
Automatic modulation classification research has largely emphasized representation accuracy, but a cognitive receiver must also decide when heterogeneous evidence justifies overriding a trusted default prediction. We study this post-inference problem through cross-fitted residual utility and a primary-preserving cognitive decision policy. A structured KAN-Fourier classifier supplies the default probability, while neural and non-neural candidates provide observable evidence. Candidate-specific residual utility is learned from train-split out-of-fold predictions, and a disjoint validation split freezes action thresholds, approved transitions, conditional routes, and a unified risk mask before held-out evaluation. On RMLA, RMLB, and HISAR, the complete system improves overall accuracy from 63.632% to 66.332%, 65.161% to 66.168%, and 77.769% to 79.867%, respectively. Controlled comparisons show that the isolated utility target does not uniformly dominate alternative out-of-fold meta-learners; the consistent gain comes from the complete evidence-and-action policy. Paired bootstrap and Holm-corrected McNemar analyses support the controlled gains. A frozen-policy stress test under carrier-frequency offset, I/Q imbalance, and synthetic Rayleigh/Rician fading yields positive gains in all 11 conditions, with every paired 95\% confidence interval above zero.
