Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper investigates an AI-assisted workflow for requirements elicitation interviews, integrating theory-guided script generation with real-time topic coverage tracking and on-demand follow-up question generation. The study reveals that AI-generated scripts significantly outperform traditional training-only scripts, scoring 92.8 versus 74.8, while also altering the interview dynamics by covering fewer topics but producing more refined goal models. The findings suggest that AI assistance not only enhances the quality of elicited requirements but also changes the trajectory of interviews, indicating a promising avenue for future research in interview methodologies.
AI-assisted workflows can transform requirements elicitation by producing higher-quality outputs while altering interview dynamics.
Requirements elicitation interviews require interviewers to balance topic coverage, active listening, and adaptive probing while responding to stakeholders in real time. Although prior work has explored AI support for isolated interviewing tasks, such as script generation and follow-up question generation, little is known about how integrated support affects the interview and what requirements artifacts emerge. Furthermore, script management---which helps the interviewer track topic coverage in real time and decide when to probe further---remains underexplored. This paper presents an AI-assisted elicitation workflow that combines theory-guided script generation grounded in business goals with live support for topic coverage tracking and on-demand follow-up question generation. We evaluate the workflow in a between-subjects quasi-experimental study comparing a no-training, AI-assisted condition with a training, AI-unassisted condition. Based on a rubric derived from elicitation best practices, the AI-generated scripts score higher than training-only scripts (92.8 vs. 74.8 out of 100). AI-assisted interviews cover fewer topics (9.6 vs. 14.5), cover more scripted questions (86% vs. 69%), ask more follow-ups per topic (3.43 vs. 1.15), and produce more refined goal models (lowest-level goal fraction 0.653 vs. 0.598). Participants find script management useful, rating topic tracking as the most useful workflow feature (86% agreement). Collectively, these results show that the AI-assisted condition is associated with a different interview trajectory and different elicited requirements than a training-only condition, positioning AI-assisted workflows as elicitation scaffolds for future studies.
CMU ML