Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates the impact of long-horizon post-training on the Qwen3.5-122B-A10B model, specifically focusing on its ability to perform software engineering tasks despite being trained solely on office workflows. The results indicate a significant 5.8-point improvement in the model's performance on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark, attributed to enhanced goal-directed execution (GDE) behaviors such as goal selection, state construction, and task verification. These findings suggest that post-training can effectively transfer skills across domains, reshaping our understanding of knowledge organization in AI systems.
Long-horizon post-training boosts software engineering performance by enhancing goal-directed execution behaviors, even when the training domain is unrelated.
Long-horizon tasks require agents to maintain coherent state and goals across nested and branching work. We call this capability goal-directed execution (GDE): the repeated application of four behaviors, namely selecting goals, constructing task-relevant state, maintaining fidelity to higher-level objectives, and verifying completion against the environment. We hypothesize that long-horizon post-training strengthens these behaviors across domains. We test this by post-training Qwen3.5-122B-A10B on 363 Long-Horizon Multi-Tool Agent (LHMTA) tasks drawn from office workflows. The collection contained no software-engineering tasks, yet the model's pass@1 improved by 5.8 points on SWE-Bench Pro. Matched trajectory analysis shows gains in all four GDE behaviors in both office workflows and software repositories. Aggregate SWE-Bench Pro statistics showed related changes in information gathering, implementation, and verification. Together, the results support a behavioral interpretation in which long-horizon post-training changed how the model organized and applied knowledge across tasks, with effects extending beyond the training domain.
