Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper systematically maps the transition from traditional AI Technical Debt (AITD) to Agentic Technical Debt (AgTD), addressing the unique challenges posed by autonomous, collaborative AI systems. By employing a theory-informed transformation methodology, the authors reinterpret 31 established AITDs within the context of agentic environments, revealing how these debts evolve into system-level liabilities that affect memory, orchestration, and decision-making. The findings underscore that technical debt in agentic systems encompasses not only software artifacts but also agent behaviors and interactions, establishing AgTD as a critical construct for AI Trust, Risk, and Security Management (AI TRiSM).
Conventional models of technical debt miss the dynamic, emergent behaviors of agentic AI, leading to new vulnerabilities in autonomous systems.
The emergence of Agentic AI systems, characterized by autonomous reasoning, multi-agent collaboration, tool orchestration, adaptive decision-making, and persistent memory, represents a fundamental shift from traditional AI pipelines to dynamic software ecosystems. While AI Technical Debt (AITD) has been widely studied in machine learning and software engineering, existing models assume static, component-level architectures and fail to capture the dynamic and emergent behaviors of agentic environments. To address this gap, this paper introduces Agentic Technical Debt (AgTD), defined as technical debt that emerges, accumulates, propagates, and amplifies due to the autonomous and collaborative nature of Agentic AI systems. Building on our prior systematic scoping review of 31 AITDs across seven root-cause categories, we employ a theory-informed transformation methodology to reinterpret these debts in Agentic AI through direct transformation, contextual transformation, and manifestation expansion. We present the first systematic mapping of established AITDs to their agentic manifestations, showing how conventional debts evolve into system-level liabilities, including memory inconsistencies, orchestration fragility, cascading failures, and unsafe autonomous decision-making. Our findings show that technical debt extends beyond software artifacts to encompass agent behaviors, coordination mechanisms, and interactions among agents, tools, and execution environments. We further examine its implications for AI Trust, Risk, and Security Management (AI TRiSM), highlighting impacts on trustworthiness, governance, security, operational resilience, and Sustainability Technical Debt. Overall, this work establishes AgTD as a foundational software engineering construct and provides a transformation framework, taxonomy, and research agenda for managing technical debt in autonomous multi-agent AI systems.
