Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper evaluates eight designs for a fusion module that combines before-and-after satellite images to efficiently match them with natural-language descriptions of changes. The authors find that a two-stage search approach significantly reduces query costs by 10-15 times while maintaining high recall rates, outperforming full-fusion methods on one benchmark. Additionally, they reveal that while Mamba's linear-time scanning is theoretically appealing, it does not provide speed advantages due to memory bandwidth limitations, and aggressive compression methods can inadvertently discard important change-relevant details.
A two-stage search approach can slash query costs by up to 15 times while maintaining high accuracy in identifying changes in satellite images.
Operational Earth observation increasingly calls for answering queries such as ``find the image pairs where a new building appeared.''This means searching an archive of before-and-after (bi-temporal) satellite image pairs and ranking each pair by how well it matches a natural-language description of the change. The component that performs this match, the fusion module that combines the ``before''and ``after''views, must be run at query time across many candidate pairs, so its speed largely sets the cost of every search. We present a controlled comparison of how to build that module. Using one fixed image encoder (a frozen CLIP model) and one training recipe for all variants, we evaluate eight designs drawn from three families: attention, state-space models (Mamba), and learned compression (our Temporal Bottleneck Fusion, TBF). Each design is tested on two benchmarks (LEVIR-CC and Dubai-CC) with ten random seeds, so the reported differences are statistically grounded. We outline three findings: first, a training-free two-stage search (a cheap difference model that shortlists candidates, followed by attention fusion that re-ranks them) matches or exceeds full-fusion recall on LEVIR-CC while cutting query cost $10$-$15\times$, with comparable R@1/R@5 on Dubai-CC; second, the linear-time scan of Mamba, attractive on paper, gives no speed benefit at the patch counts typical of vision transformers ($L{=}196$): the scan is limited by memory bandwidth, whereas attention maps cleanly onto parallel hardware; and third, compressing the fused representation (TBF) reduces parameters by $2.3\times$ and latency by $1.6\times$ for a change-only BLEU-1 cost of $0.007$, although more aggressive compression quietly discards change-relevant detail that aggregate metrics fail to reveal.
