Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper identifies a critical vulnerability in large language models (LLMs) known as Salience Bias, where models prioritize explicit distractors over implicit commonsense reasoning, leading to significant reasoning failures. Through the creation of the SaliTrap Benchmark, the authors evaluate 12 state-of-the-art LLMs and demonstrate that these models are heavily influenced by distractor density, often failing to recognize essential commonsense prerequisites. Importantly, the study reveals that these failures stem from knowledge suppression rather than a lack of commonsense knowledge, as context-free probes recover over 90% of compliance failures, and lightweight prompting techniques can effectively mitigate these issues without retraining.
Salience Bias in LLMs reveals that models often ignore commonsense reasoning in favor of misleading explicit cues, with lightweight prompting showing promise in addressing this issue.
As large language models (LLMs) continue to advance in complex reasoning tasks, they have learned to heavily prioritize explicit conditions provided in the input. However, in everyday commonsense reasoning, this mechanism exposes a critical vulnerability which we term Salience Bias: models become easily hijacked by useless explicit distractors (e.g., numerical values), leading them to ignore the implicit physical or commonsense prerequisites of a task. A critical open question is whether this failure reflects a genuine gap in commonsense knowledge or merely its suppression under misleading task framing. To investigate this, we construct the SaliTrap Benchmark, a high-quality dataset across four trap dimensions. Evaluating 12 state-of-the-art LLMs, we find that all mainstream models suffer significantly from salience bias, with severity scaling with distractor density and detecting the trap often decoupled from actually avoiding it. Crucially, by re-eliciting the same models with the task framing stripped away, we show that this is overwhelmingly a failure of knowledge suppression rather than knowledge absence: a context-free knowledge probe alone recovers over 90\% of sycophantic-compliance failures, revealing that the requisite commonsense is intrinsically present but actively crowded out by salient distractors that lure the model into over-compliant, unnecessary computation. Building on this diagnosis, we further show that lightweight, inference-time prompting alone substantially closes the gap without any retraining. Our findings relocate the bottleneck of commonsense reasoning failures from model competence to elicitation, and we release SaliTrap as a testbed for this blind spot. The codes are available at https://github.com/Wuzheng02/SaliTrap.
