Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
The EMBL AI Librarian enhances the Europe PMC interface for AI agents by allowing them to query life-science literature in natural language, streamlining the knowledge retrieval process. Utilizing a single large language model (LLM), it orchestrates subqueries and extracts relevant evidence from selected papers, significantly improving performance on various benchmarks. Evaluation results indicate that Librarian boosts Citation F1 scores by over 16 points on ScholarQABench and enhances agreement with expert consensus in claim verification tasks, demonstrating its effectiveness in supporting life-science AI applications.
Life-science AI agents can now access literature more efficiently, achieving over 16-point improvements in citation accuracy through natural language queries.
The web is increasingly accessed by AI agents rather than humans. Every agent needs knowledge, especially in the life-sciences, where agentic pipelines are growing fast. Access to the literature is a crucial part of that need, and resources such as Europe PMC, with over 40M indexed records, are widely used to meet it. Yet these resources were not built for AI agents: they take keywords and complex syntax and return whole papers, so every agent must learn the syntax, issue several searches, and read full papers to find the evidence it needs. We introduce EMBL AI Librarian, a knowledge layer that upgrades the Europe PMC interface for AI agents: an agent asks in natural language and receives evidence that answers it. A single LLM orchestrates the whole knowledge retrieval process: it plans complementary subqueries executed by the live Europe PMC search engine, then reads the selected papers and locates the relevant evidence. We evaluate Librarian across four benchmarks: literature synthesis, claim verification, open-domain question answering, and downstream biology tasks such as protocol questions and sequence manipulation. On ScholarQABench, Librarian improves Citation F1 by more than 16 points over strong recently published baselines. Used as the retrieval layer of an existing claim-verification pipeline, it increases agreement with expert consensus; and on the open-form LitQA2 benchmark, a GPT-5.4 agent scores about 8 points higher when grounded in Librarian than with web search. Overall, our results show that equipping life-science agents with the Librarian knowledge layer improves performance across a range of tasks. We release our code publicly at https://github.com/petroni-lab/librarian
