Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores the interplay between internal personality-related representations, situational contexts, and behavioral outputs in large language models (LLMs) using Funder's personality triad framework. By employing contrastive behavior pairs and SAE decomposition, the authors identify sparse internal features that correlate with personality traits and validate their influence on behavior across various situations. The results demonstrate that LLMs can exhibit controllable, trait-like representations that affect their responses in a manner consistent with human personality research, revealing a deeper understanding of LLM behavior beyond mere output conditioning.
LLMs exhibit controllable, trait-like representations that influence their behavior across diverse contexts, mirroring human personality dynamics.
Human personality theories characterize traits not as isolated attributes captured by a single score, but as stable individual tendencies expressed through the interplay among persons, situations, and behaviors. Existing studies of personality-related behavior in LLMs have primarily focused on outputs elicited under personality conditioning, characterizing observable trait-related expressions while lacking mechanistic evidence for the existence of internal personality-related representations, their cross-situational expression, and how these representations shape specific behaviors. Building on Funder's personality triad framework, we adapt its three components for LLM analysis: Person as personality-related internal representations, Situation as contexts that afford trait-relevant responses, and Behavior as response patterns on broader social tasks. We introduce a framework for discovering, controlling, and validating trait-like representations in LLMs. First, using contrastive behavior pairs grounded in shared situations, we identify sparse internal features associated with opposing poles of personality traits through SAE decomposition. We validate their trait relevance through effects on behavior to situation, token-level activation patterns, and robustness to paraphrasing. Second, feature-level interventions induce bidirectional trait-related shifts across a separate, diverse set of situations while preserving response validity, demonstrating consistent expression across contexts. Third, applying the same interventions to social intelligence tasks reveals behavioral changes with benefit-tradeoff patterns consistent with findings from human personality research, providing behavioral-level validation beyond personality scores. Our findings provide evidence that LLMs contain controllable trait-like representations linking internal states, situational expression, and behavioral outcomes.
