Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study explores how different behavioral framings of sustainability information in recommendation explanations influence user choices and perceptions, leveraging generative AI to create sustainability-aware explanations. Through two randomized studies involving 529 participants, the research reveals that while plain disclosure of sustainability information does not alter choices, framing that information or using descriptive social norms significantly boosts sustainable selections. The findings highlight a divergence between user perception and actual behavior, suggesting that effective explanation design can enhance decision-making towards sustainability without necessarily changing choice behavior.
Framing sustainability information in recommendation explanations can significantly nudge users towards more sustainable choices, even when plain disclosure fails to do so.
Recommender systems mediate everyday consumption, offering a promising channel for encouraging sustainable choices. Prior research shows that explanations influence users' perceptions of recommendations and can support more informed decisions. We argue that explanations can also serve as behavioral nudges by foregrounding sustainability information at the moment of choice. This study investigates how different behavioral framings of sustainability information in recommendation explanations affect user choices and perceptions. Using generative AI, we generate sustainability-aware explanations by drawing on nudge theory and validate them through human evaluation and LLM-as-a-judge audits. Building on this foundation, we conduct two randomized studies ($N = 529$) in a low involvement domain (instant coffee) and a high involvement domain (hotel bookings), in which participants choose among preference matched recommendations accompanied by these explanations. Our results show that, across both domains, merely disclosing sustainability information in explanations does not change choices, whereas framing that information or invoking a descriptive social norm significantly increases sustainable selections and eases decision-making. Notably, perception and behavior diverge, as plain disclosure improves explanation evaluations without translating into more sustainable selection behavior. Our work demonstrates how LLMs can generate theory-grounded explanations at scale, pointing toward practical explanation-based interventions for social good. We conclude by discussing implications for adaptive explanation design with generative AI.
