Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper provides a theoretical analysis of the Cluster-as-Distribution (CaD) clustering method, which utilizes a greedy search approach to effectively identify clusters of arbitrary shapes, densities, and sizes. The authors demonstrate that the greedy search can be mapped to a partition matroid, leading to a near-optimality guarantee for the CaD clustering objective, with the regret controlled by the approximation error between true and empirical distribution embeddings. This work elucidates the conditions under which CaD clustering outperforms traditional set-oriented methods, which struggle with irregular cluster structures.
Greedy search in clustering not only achieves optimal outcomes but also reveals why traditional methods fail with irregular cluster shapes and densities.
Many existing clustering methods are designed based on a set-oriented definition---a cluster is a set of similar points---relying a point-to-point similarity function to find similar points. This works well for compact clusters, but clustering performance can deteriorate badly when cluster shapes are irregular, and densities or sizes vary between clusters. Recent `Cluster-as-Distribution' (CaD) clustering has been shown to discover these generic types of clusters in practice by treating each cluster as a set of independent and identically distributed points generated from some unknown distribution via a greedy search, achieving a clustering objective equivalent to that of Spectral Clustering, but with better clustering outcomes without eigen-decomposition. However, a theoretical analysis of this phenomenon is still lacking. Our analyses are from two angles. First, we analyze the approximation error between the true and empirical distribution embeddings. Second, we show that the greedy search employed to achieve the CaD clustering objective can be mapped to a partition matroid---yielding greedy optimality. These yield a near-optimality guarantee for the CaD clustering objective, with regret controlled by the approximation error. This is the first analysis that explains why CaD clustering via greedy search can discover clusters of arbitrary shapes, densities and sizes (where all set-oriented clustering methods have failed to discover) when the estimated cluster embeddings faithfully approximate the underlying cluster distributions.
