Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study conducts a comprehensive evaluation of online support systems for victims of technology-facilitated abuse (TFA) by analyzing responses across web search, peer-support forums, and conversational AI. Utilizing qualitative coding and supervised classifiers on a decade of victim narratives from r/Stalking, the authors assess the relevance, accuracy, and safety of responses to TFA-related queries. The results indicate that while Google Search and general-purpose LLMs offer more actionable guidance, none of the platforms consistently provide safe, trauma-informed support, revealing significant vulnerabilities in digital resources for TFA victims.
Over 65% of victim queries in online searches lead to potentially harmful links, exposing critical flaws in digital support systems for technology-facilitated abuse victims.
Technology-facilitated abuse (TFA), the use of digital technologies to stalk, harass, monitor or threaten others, has become a pervasive form of interpersonal harm. As victims turn to online sources for guidance, responses can shape how they assess risks, interpret abuse, and choose protective actions. We present a large-scale evaluation of online support for TFA victims across three channels: web search, peer-support forums, and conversational AI systems. Drawing on a decade of victim narratives from r/Stalking, we use qualitative coding and supervised classifiers to construct a dataset of TFA queries spanning 11 categories of technology misuse. We simulate these queries across the three channels and evaluate responses using a unified framework spanning technical, social, and safety dimensions. The framework assesses relevance, accuracy, actionability, persuasiveness, and understandability, alongside platform risks and support characteristics, including social-engineering risk, toxicity, empathy, bias, risky guidance, and support information. We build and validate automated classifiers to scale the evaluation. Our findings reveal differences in support quality across platforms. Google Search and general-purpose LLMs provide more relevant and actionable guidance than Reddit discussions, yet none consistently provide safe, trauma-informed support. More than 65% of victim queries encounter potentially malicious links in search results, over 20% of Reddit discussions contain toxic responses, and conversational AI systems frequently fail to provide risk-aware guidance or concrete support resources. Surprisingly, domain-specific survivor-support chatbots underperform general-purpose LLMs across most dimensions. These findings expose weaknesses in digital support for TFA victims and highlight the need for safety-centered design, evaluation, and deployment of future support technologies.
