Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper critiques the prevailing assumption that human involvement in processes will diminish as AI capabilities advance, proposing instead that human participation is essential for three key reasons: technical complementarity, normative value, and emergent target formation. The authors argue that in many contexts, human input is not just supplementary but foundational to the objectives that arise from collaborative interactions with AI. Their findings suggest that human-AI co-construction is a permanent aspect of certain activities, influencing how we approach the design and ethical considerations of future AI systems.
Human participation isn't just a stopgap for AI's shortcomings; it's a vital component in shaping outcomes that emerge through collaboration.
The rapid progress of AI has intensified the long-standing pursuit of automation: replacing human participation with algorithms wherever possible. Implicit in this pursuit is the assumption that humans remain in the loop only because current AI systems are not yet sufficiently capable. This paper challenges that assumption. Rather than asking how far automation can extend, we ask where its conceptual limits lie and argue that human participation may persist even with highly capable AI systems for three distinct reasons. Technical or complementarity grounds arise when humans contribute capabilities or perspectives unavailable to AI. Normative or developmental grounds arise when participation itself is valuable for human agency or learning. Most importantly, emergence grounds arise from target emergence: in some activities, the target is not fully specified in advance but instead emerges through the interaction itself. In these cases, human participation is not merely a means of improving execution but is constitutive of the target being produced. Human--AI co-construction, understood as the joint production of outcomes by humans and AI systems, is therefore not simply a temporary response to imperfect AI, but a persistent feature of activities whose objectives emerge through participation. This perspective has important implications for the limits of automation and for the design, evaluation, and ethics of future AI systems.
