Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study analyzes the impact of large language models (LLMs) on scientific collaboration and labor division by linking publication data and collaboration histories of over 775,000 scientists. Findings reveal a significant shift towards interdisciplinary research and exploration, particularly among established scientists and those from low- and middle-income countries, post-2022. Additionally, the research highlights a trend toward more differentiated roles within research teams, with contributors adopting narrower and more fluid responsibilities, indicating a reorganization of scientific workflows in the LLM era.
After 2022, scientists are not just collaborating more; they鈥檙e venturing into intellectually distant fields, reshaping the landscape of scientific inquiry.
Large language models (LLMs) have rapidly and significantly entered scientific workflows, but it remains unclear how their diffusion is associated with changes in scientists' strategies in research directions and team building. We link PubMed Central full text with OpenAlex publication and collaboration histories for 775,323 scientists and analyze CRediT contribution statements from 137,120 multi-author papers. After 2022, scientists increasingly published across more intellectually distant fields and entered fields in which they had not previously worked. These increases in interdisciplinarity and exploration were especially pronounced among established scientists and scientists from non-English-speaking low- and middle-income countries. Authors with stronger AI-writing signals were already more interdisciplinary and exploratory before the widespread adoption of LLMs, and the gap widened further after 2022 compared with authors with weaker AI-writing signals. Scientists' collaboration networks also became more interdisciplinary after 2022. Yet, among authors with stronger AI-writing signals, research interdisciplinarity was less closely tied to the disciplinary diversity of their collaborators. The division of labor within research teams also became more differentiated. Contributors on papers published after 2022 reported narrower role sets on average, coauthors shared fewer roles in common, and their role profiles became less rigid and more fluid. Software and validation roles increased, while conceptual and management roles decreased. These patterns suggest that team members are taking on more distinct responsibilities and may rely less on one another to perform research tasks. Overall, this study indicates that the LLM era coincides with a broader reorganization of scientific exploration, collaboration, and the division of labor.
