Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a framework for reputation-aware consensus algorithms in blockchain networks that leverages intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and uninorm aggregation operations (UAOs) to address issues of centralization and exclusion in validator selection. By modeling reputation with IFSs, the framework captures the inherent uncertainty in reputation values, while UAOs facilitate the dynamic monitoring of validators' reputations over time. Experimental results indicate that this approach enhances performance and promotes fairness in consensus mechanisms without increasing computational complexity or communication overhead.
Reputation-aware consensus algorithms can significantly enhance fairness in blockchain networks, allowing validators to learn from past mistakes without the burden of additional computational costs.
The operation of blockchain is governed by consensus algorithms (CA). Several consensus mechanisms require significant computational power, while others necessitate high amounts of stakes to select the participant to validate and verify the transactions in the block, leading to centralisation of power and participant exclusion. This paper proposes a novel methodology to address these issues in reputation-based consensus algorithms by studying the reputation behaviour of the validator using intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) and uninorm aggregation operations (UAOs). Our approach uses IFSs to express the "reputation" because the reputation values in a consensus algorithm eventually imply uncertainty, and IFSs facilitate the representation of a lack of precise knowledge about reputation. Moreover, this methodology utilises uninorm aggregation operations to monitor reputation over time and reinforces the importance of negative and positive reputation. Consequently, this solution allows validators to rectify past failures in subsequent verification processes and foster an equitable consensus algorithm design. The proposed framework maintains linear computational complexity and does not introduce additional communication overhead beyond the underlying consensus protocol. Supported by experimental results, our methodology demonstrates improved performance and evaluation, promising advancements in blockchain network fairness and inclusivity.
