Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces PoTRE, a heterogeneous reasoning framework that enhances Large Language Models' (LLMs) capabilities in complex reasoning tasks by decoupling inference into four specialized agents. By employing a Task-Adaptive Aggregation Layer, PoTRE dynamically synthesizes the outputs of these agents to generate robust solutions, achieving state-of-the-art performance on challenging benchmarks like Humanity's Last Exam. Notably, PoTRE surpasses previous accuracy records while utilizing a comparable or reduced number of inference tokens compared to traditional homogeneous models.
PoTRE's innovative use of diverse reasoning agents leads to a remarkable 49.92% accuracy on Humanity's Last Exam, setting a new benchmark for LLM performance in complex reasoning tasks.
While Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at many tasks, they frequently struggle with complex reasoning that requires long-horizon planning and iterative error correction. Furthermore, standard single-stream prompting proves brittle when models encounter novel abstractions or rigorous domain constraints. We introduce PoTRE (Poly-Topological Reasoning Ensembles), a heterogeneous framework that decouples inference into four agents: (1) Adversarial Refinement Agent, (2) Hierarchical strategic Planning Agent, (3) Spectrum Search Agent, and (4) Direct Chain Agent. A final Task-Adaptive Aggregation Layer dynamically reconciles these perspectives -- via final candidate selection, semantic synthesis, or neuro-symbolic verification -- to produce a robust global solution. We evaluate PoTRE on three frontier benchmarks: ARC-AGI-2, Humanity's Last Exam (HLE), and PRBench Finance. PoTRE achieves state-of-the-art accuracy of 49.92% on HLE, surpassing the previous best official score. We demonstrate that this architectural heterogeneity achieves improved reasoning performance using similar or fewer inference tokens compared to heavily scaled homogeneous baselines.
Google Research