Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper challenges the conventional repair-first approach in multimodal sentiment analysis (MSA) by demonstrating that not all missing modalities need to be repaired for optimal performance. Through a per-sample oracle analysis, it reveals that full-modality input is only beneficial for a minority of samples, indicating that the utility of modalities is highly sample-dependent. The authors introduce SIEVE, a novel framework that learns to decide whether to repair missing modalities based on empirical sufficiency signals, leading to improved performance across various missing rates on standard datasets.
Not every missing modality needs to be repaired for optimal sentiment analysis, and SIEVE learns to make this decision dynamically at the sample level.
Existing methods for multimodal sentiment analysis (MSA) under missing modalities usually follow a repair-first paradigm. We revisit this assumption and ask: \emph{should every missing modality be repaired?} A per-sample oracle analysis shows the answer is not always: full-modality input is optimal for only a small fraction of samples, and every modality subset is preferred by some samples. These results suggest that adding or repairing modalities may not always improve prediction, and that the utility of each modality is sample-dependent. Building on this finding, we propose \textbf{S}ufficiency-\textbf{I}nformed \textbf{E}vidential \textbf{V}al\textbf{vE} (\textbf{SIEVE}) that turns ``whether to repair'' into an explicit, learnable decision at the sample level. SIEVE compares a direct prediction branch with a repair branch, derives an empirical sufficiency signal from their per-sample loss gap, and routes each input through an evidential gate that jointly models sufficiency and its epistemic uncertainty. SIEVE is repair-agnostic: it operates as a plug-and-play decision on top of any explicit or implicit repair module, without modifying its internal design. Experiments on CMU-MOSI and IEMOCAP show that SIEVE consistently improves representative repair backbones across evaluated missing rates, and approaches the per-sample dual-branch achievable optimum.
