Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces SciDiagramEdit, a framework designed to automate the editing of scientific diagrams based on natural-language instructions, addressing the complexities of visual elements in research figures. By leveraging a benchmark that analyzes before-and-after figure pairs from arXiv version histories, the authors employ agentic learning to refine the editing skills of an agent through iterative feedback. The key finding demonstrates that using natural paper revisions as training data significantly enhances the accuracy of figure edits, suggesting a viable approach for streamlining the revision process in scientific publishing.
Natural paper revisions can be harnessed to train AI agents for precise and context-aware editing of complex scientific diagrams.
Editing the figures in a research paper is a routine and time-consuming part of everyday research practice: authors relabel components, rearrange panels, and restyle visuals as they revise their manuscripts. Automating this editing workflow under a natural-language instruction, however, is challenging, because a scientific figure is a dense infographic in which heterogeneous visual elements such as schematics, plots, photos, captions, and arrows are composed under a tight visual grammar to advance a specific argument. To address this, we present SciDiagramEdit, a benchmark and skill-evolution framework that learns from natural paper revisions and operates on the figure's editable vector source, where users can inspect and co-edit individual primitives alongside the agent. Our benchmark mines before/after figure pairs from arXiv version histories, each grounded in the authors'own revision intent. To accommodate the diversity of editing instructions, we adopt agentic learning via skill evolution: an agentic proposer continually refines the agent's skill specification from execution traces over multiple epochs. The resulting skill progressively lifts edit accuracy on a held-out validation set, providing evidence that natural paper revisions are an effective training signal for instruction-driven figure editing.
Microsoft Research