Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper evaluates language-model security agents by incorporating a cost-aware framework that assesses both offensive and defensive capabilities under fixed budget constraints. By analyzing performance on Cybench and Splunk BOTS v1 challenges, the authors reveal that while offensive tasks benefit from increased computational resources, defensive tasks rely more on strategic tool utilization and telemetry navigation. The findings advocate for a shift in security-agent benchmarks to include economic efficiency, offering a more nuanced understanding of model effectiveness in real-world applications.
Offensive security agents can significantly outperform proprietary systems when evaluated through a cost-aware lens, while defensive agents reveal a stark reliance on tool discipline over sheer computational power.
Security-agent evaluations commonly measure peak offensive capability under generous inference budgets, emphasizing vulnerability discovery, exploit development, penetration testing, and CTF completion. Such measurements are useful but incomplete: in operational security, every reasoning step, tool call, telemetry query, and enrichment request consumes budget. We evaluate language-model security agents through this cost-success lens on offensive Cybench challenges and defensive Splunk BOTS v1 investigation challenges. Instead of reporting only best-case success, we compare models at fixed cost levels and decompose performance by inference spend and tool spend. Our results show distinct scalingregimes for red- and blue-team tasks. Offensive CTF performance improves with additional test-time compute, and scaled open-weight models can approach frontier proprietary systems while remaining cost-competitive. Defensive SOC investigation does not scale in the same way: success depends more heavily on disciplined tool use, telemetry navigation, and selective enrichment than on raw reasoning budget alone. We argue that security-agent benchmarks should measure economic efficiency and operational fit alongside task success. Cost-aware, SOC-native evaluations provide a clearer picture of which models are practically useful today and where defensive agents still need to improve. We present an interactive website with our results https://evals.frontier.security.
