Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces OmniaBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate general AI agents across a wide array of scenarios, addressing the limitations of existing benchmarks that often focus on narrow contexts. By deriving a hierarchical taxonomy from diverse sources, the authors created a dataset of 1,431 tasks, including a challenging subset of 644 tasks, to systematically assess agent capabilities in various domains. The results reveal that even advanced models like Claude-Sonnet-5 and GPT-5.6-Sol struggle with overall pass rates, highlighting significant gaps in planning and adaptive correction abilities.
Even state-of-the-art models only achieve pass rates below 60% on a new benchmark that spans 1,431 diverse tasks, exposing critical weaknesses in general AI capabilities.
Large language models are increasingly evolving from text generators into general agents capable of understanding user requests, invoking external tools, and completing complex tasks through interaction. However, existing agent benchmarks often focus on limited scenarios, tool ecosystems, or interaction formats, making it difficult to systematically characterize model capabilities across heterogeneous application settings. We introduce OmniaBench, a benchmark for evaluating general agents across diverse scenarios with explicit state spaces. We derive application-oriented scenario knowledge from app stores, product documents, industry resources, Web retrieval, and human refinement, forming a hierarchical taxonomy that spans ToC, ToB and ToE with 90 level-1 and 354 level-2 domains. Based on this taxonomy, we construct executable environments and synthesize single-turn and multi-turn tasks through four complementary routes: DAG, DAG-S, Solver, and Program. OmniaBench further introduces a ten-dimensional capability taxonomy and eight compositional atomic difficulty factors to support fine-grained evaluation and analysis. The resulting dataset contains 1,431 tasks, together with a challenging subset of 644 tasks designed to reduce evaluation cost and mitigate potential contamination of the full set after public release. The bench presents substantial challenges to current frontier models, with even Claude-Sonnet-5 and GPT-5.6-Sol achieving Overall Pass@1 scores of only 58.54 and 57.14, respectively. Further analyses reveal clear differences across domains and capabilities, as well as persistent limitations in planning, constraint maintenance, and adaptive correction. OmniaBench provides a broad and diagnostic benchmark for characterizing the capability boundaries of general agents.
