Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study investigates real-time music enhancement techniques that operate under strict causal and low-latency constraints, addressing the challenges posed by noise, reverberation, and other degradations in music signals. By adapting compact causal networks specifically for music and benchmarking against various models, the authors find that while all causal models can achieve real-time processing, the effectiveness of enhancements is highly dependent on the type of degradation and dataset used. The key takeaway is that indiscriminate enhancement can sometimes worsen audio quality, highlighting the need for degradation-aware and identity-preserving approaches in music enhancement.
Real-time music enhancement is achievable, but indiscriminate methods can actually degrade audio quality, revealing the critical need for tailored approaches.
Music recordings and live streams are often affected by noise, reverberation, spectral imbalances, or artifacts that degrade listening quality. While speech enhancement has matured into a well-defined research area, music enhancement is less established because musical signals combine overlapping sources, wide bandwidths, strong dynamics, and intentional production effects. We study real-time music enhancement under strict causal and low-latency constraints. We formulate the task around recovery of the intended produced mix from acoustic and production-oriented degradations, adapt compact causal networks to music, and compare speech-derived real-time baselines, an external music-denoising model, an offline restoration reference, and a music-specific MusicFilterNet-MS variant. On the tested hardware, all causal models run faster than real time, but improvements depend strongly on the dataset, degradation type, and metric family; under several objective criteria, indiscriminate enhancement can worsen the degraded input. The main contribution is therefore a benchmark and an analysis rather than a universal best model: real-time music enhancement is feasible, but robust improvement requires degradation-aware modeling, stereo-aware processing, identity-preserving correction, and evaluation beyond a single objective score.
