Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper introduces a fine-tuned multi-agent framework designed to detect OCEAN personality traits from life narratives, addressing the challenges of latent and context-dependent personality assessment. By conditioning sub-agents to adopt varying perspectives for each trait and employing a judge LLM to aggregate their outputs, the framework effectively mitigates biases inherent in single-model inferences. Evaluations demonstrate that this approach not only enhances prediction accuracy but also provides interpretability in text-based personality inference.
Multi-agent reasoning reveals nuanced personality insights, outperforming traditional single-model approaches in detecting OCEAN traits from narratives.
Accurately assessing personality from text is challenging because traits are latent, context-dependent, and often subtly expressed across long narratives. Large language models (LLMs) offer new opportunities by processing extensive textual contexts, but pretraining of these models can induce latent "personality-like" biases, making single-model inferences inconsistent. We propose a fine-tuned multi-agent framework for detecting OCEAN personality traits, in which sub-agents are conditioned to adopt high, low, or neutral perspectives for each trait through masked language modeling (MLM) and psychometric supervision. A judge LLM aggregates and compares sub-agent outputs to generate final trait predictions, capturing multiple complementary perspectives while mitigating individual model biases. We evaluate the framework on life narrative dataset through quantitative and qualitative experiments, including baselines, ablations, and inference quality analyses. Our approach offers a scalable and interpretable method for text-based personality inference, highlighting the benefits of multi-agent reasoning grounded in psychometric supervision.
