Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
MM-ToolSandBox is a comprehensive evaluation framework designed for visually grounded tool-calling agents, featuring a stateful execution environment with over 500 tools across 16 domains. The framework facilitates multi-image, multi-turn tasks while addressing real-world conversational complexities, and it includes an automated scenario generation pipeline that produces a diverse set of human-verified scenarios. Evaluation of 12 state-of-the-art models reveals that even the best-performing model struggles with a success rate below 50%, primarily due to challenges in visual precision rather than planning capabilities, indicating a need for differentiated research approaches based on model scale.
Current state-of-the-art models struggle with visual tool-calling, achieving less than 50% success even in ideal conditions.
We introduce MM-ToolSandBox, a benchmark and evaluation framework for visually grounded tool-calling agents. The framework provides a stateful execution environment spanning 500+ tools across 16 application domains, supporting multi-image, multi-turn tasks where agents must ground progressively arriving visual inputs into executable tool calls while handling realistic conversational phenomena (goal revisions, error corrections, state mutations). An automated scenario generation pipeline produces diverse, visually grounded scenarios through information-flow-guided planning and multi-stage quality filtering, yielding 258 human-verified nominal scenarios and 50 variants targeting interactive UI applications. Evaluating 12 state-of-the-art models, from 4B open-weight to frontier proprietary systems, shows that current models still lack robust visual tool-calling capability: even the best model achieves below 50% success rate. Our failure analysis further reveals that visual precision, not only planning, is a primary bottleneck for capable models: 53% of failures stem from incorrect information extraction from images despite otherwise correct task workflows. A planning-to-precision crossover emerges with scale: smaller models fail at deciding what to do, while larger models fail at perceiving what they see, suggesting fundamentally different research directions for improving models at different capability levels. The framework and the benchmark are publicly available at https://github.com/apple/ml-mmtoolsandbox
