Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper applies case-based decision theory (CBDT) to neural networks, enabling a precise decomposition of action scores into contributions from individual training cases. By fitting an ordinary least squares (OLS) action readout on a fixed neural representation, the authors demonstrate that each action score can be expressed as a weighted sum of training-case returns, facilitating auditability in high-stakes decision-making contexts. The method not only recovers case-level preference structures but also outperforms existing attribution baselines in terms of consistency and support reconstruction across various tasks, all while requiring minimal adjustments to the neural model.
Action scores from neural networks can be traced back to specific training cases, revealing their influence with unprecedented clarity.
Neural networks increasingly guide decisions in high-stakes domains such as medical diagnosis, credit approval, and energy bidding. Audit in these settings requires case-level evidence: which training cases support an action and what outcomes they carried. Case-based decision theory (CBDT) formalizes this reasoning by aggregating outcome support from remembered cases. We show that an OLS action readout fitted on a fixed neural representation admits an exact case-based decomposition. Each action score is a weighted sum of training-case returns, with coefficients determined by empirical Gram geometry. We identify a sufficient regime for CBDT similarity semantics; outside it, the coefficients should generally be treated as signed Gram-geometric influence. The decomposition yields audit signals that trace scores to training cases, measure action coherence, and identify weak support. Across synthetic CBDT, PJM, Adult Income, and Default Credit tasks, the method recovers case-level preference structure and achieves the highest mean Top-30 consistency among compared attribution baselines, while remaining competitive on support reconstruction. The audit requires only fitting an OLS top-layer probe, without retraining the representation or accessing the original optimization trajectory; probe fidelity is measured by score reconstruction.
