Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenge of color bias in low-light raw image denoising, which arises from black-level errors that degrade performance and cause color shifts. The authors propose a calibration-free, camera-agnostic approach that utilizes a bias estimator network to predict and correct these errors, leading to improved color accuracy in denoised images. Evaluations on multiple datasets show that their method outperforms existing blind denoising techniques and competes with those requiring stronger supervision, while also revealing significant biases in the widely used SIDD dataset.
Color bias from black-level errors can severely impact low-light image denoising, but a new calibration-free approach effectively corrects this issue, outperforming traditional methods.
Raw images inherently suffer from noise due to the stochastic nature of light and sensor hardware imperfections. As real photon counts fall, the ratio of this noise to the signal degrades; consequently, for low-light conditions, robust denoising is especially vital for high-quality results. While recent data-driven methods achieve strong performance, they typically rely on large-scale noisy-clean image pairs that are costly and difficult to collect. Alternatively, parametric noise models can generate synthetic training data, but this necessitates precise camera calibration, which is often impractical for unknown devices. In this work, we propose a camera-agnostic, calibration-free paradigm for low-light raw denoising. We identify that color bias from black-level error is a primary source of performance degradation and causes severe color shifts. To mitigate this, we introduce a bias estimator network that predicts the black-level error as a global feature of the noisy input. We evaluate our approach across the ELD, SID, and LRID datasets, demonstrating superior performance among blind denoisers, particularly in terms of color correction. In many cases, we are competitive with-or can even surpass-methods with stronger supervision. Furthermore, we reveal that the widely used SIDD dataset contains significant color bias in its ground-truth images, which yields unrealistic color reproduction in trained models. We introduce a new ground-truth extraction framework to resolve this issue and provide a benchmark of existing methods on the corrected dataset.
