Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This paper addresses the challenge of regulation-driven fine-grained classification, where input instances must be assigned to specific classes based on complex regulatory hierarchies rather than mere semantic similarity. The authors introduce a constraint-aware hierarchical search framework that transforms regulatory documents into a searchable tree structure, enabling the retrieval of valid candidate nodes and guiding classification decisions with structured regulatory fields and evidence snippets. Experimental results demonstrate that this approach significantly outperforms existing methods, achieving the highest mean accuracy across four benchmark datasets, particularly excelling in scenarios involving nuanced boundary conditions and closely related categories.
Fine-grained classification under regulatory constraints can be effectively achieved with a novel framework that ensures both accuracy and interpretability in decision-making paths.
Tasks such as customs tariff classification, export control categorization, and standards-based equipment coding require assigning an input instance to a fine-grained class under an explicit regulatory hierarchy. Unlike standard text classification, the correct label in these tasks is not determined by semantic similarity alone, but by rule-defined boundaries, threshold conditions, exclusion clauses, definitions, and local exceptions. As a result, two highly similar inputs may require different labels, while a retrieved passage that appears relevant may still be inapplicable under the governing rules. Existing flat classifiers, hierarchical text classification methods, and retrieval-augmented LLM systems are not designed to jointly enforce hierarchical validity, rule consistency, and fine-grained boundary reasoning. In this paper, we formulate this setting as regulation-driven fine-grained hierarchical classification, where an external instance must be assigned to a fine-grained class through a valid path in a regulatory hierarchy and supported by auditable evidence. We construct four benchmark datasets from representative regulation-intensive scenarios and validate the annotations through an expert-in-the-loop process. We further propose a constraint-aware hierarchical search framework that converts regulatory documents into a searchable tree, retrieves only valid local candidate nodes, and uses structured regulatory fields with evidence snippets to guide each next-hop decision. Experiments show that our method achieves the best mean accuracy on all four datasets and provides interpretable decision paths, with the largest gains on cases involving fine-grained neighboring categories and rule-based boundary conditions.
