Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
This study introduces HCC-STAR, a clinically aligned large language model designed to enhance risk stratification and treatment guidance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by analyzing electronic medical records (EMRs). By curating a dataset of approximately 30,000 HCC cases and employing a knowledge-aligned reasoning framework, HCC-STAR outperformed existing clinical guidelines and competitive models like GPT-5 and Gemini-2.5 Pro in a multi-center cohort of 6,668 patients, achieving a median survival of 51 months when its recommendations were followed, compared to 29 and 32 months under traditional guidelines.
HCC-STAR not only surpasses leading models in treatment accuracy but also offers a significant survival advantage, highlighting the potential of AI in precision oncology.
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality. Current guidelines and staging systems provide coarse categories, but often miss within-stage heterogeneity and the clinical context in electronic medical records (EMRs). We present HCC-STAR (Hepatocellular Carcinoma Staging, Treatment And pRognosis), a clinically aligned large language model that reads routine EMR narratives and jointly outputs risk score-based staging, ranked guideline-consistent treatments with evidence-based rationales, and individualized survival estimates. We curated about 30,000 HCC cases from SEER and expanded them into EMR-style narrative training data using a clinician-validated, prompt-based augmentation workflow. On this corpus, we developed a knowledge-aligned reasoning framework optimized with a step-verifiable composite reward, moving beyond text-level memorization of clinical guidelines. In a multi-center cohort of 6,668 patients from 12 hospitals in China, HCC-STAR achieved state-of-the-art performance in treatment recommendation and risk stratification compared with clinical guidelines and competitive models, including GPT-5 and Gemini-2.5 Pro. Hypothetical overall-survival analysis showed a median survival of 51 months under adherence to HCC-STAR recommendations, compared with 29 and 32 months under BCLC and CNLC. In clinician-centric evaluations, blinded hepatobiliary specialists rated HCC-STAR's reasoning and evidence-based justifications as trustworthy. The model surpassed resident and attending physicians in treatment accuracy and helped physicians make more accurate decisions faster when used as an assistant. These findings support HCC-STAR as a reliable and verifiable decision-support system for risk stratification and precision therapy in HCC.