Search papers, labs, and topics across Lattice.
ImputeViz is a visual analytics dashboard designed to address the challenges of missing data in research by enabling users to diagnose missingness patterns and compare various imputation methods, including MICE, Random Forest, XGBoost, and kNN. The dashboard introduces gKNN, a geographically informed variant of kNN that incorporates socioeconomic and spatial distances, allowing for a more nuanced understanding of donor contributions and enhancing accountability in imputation. Key findings from case studies illustrate how ImputeViz aids analysts in selecting effective imputation strategies, identifying sensitive variables, and evaluating model robustness through comprehensive visualizations and method comparisons.
A new visual analytics tool reveals the hidden complexities of missing data, empowering researchers to make informed imputation choices with unprecedented clarity.
Missing data is a persistent obstacle in scientific, social science, and public health research, often biasing analyses and placing accountability on analysts for how they handle missing values. We introduce ImputeViz, an integrated visual analytics dashboard that supports diagnosing missingness, configuring imputation models, and evaluating results. The system brings together widely used methods, including MICE, Random Forest, XGBoost, and kNN, within an interactive environment that makes missingness patterns explicit. To support geospatial reasoning, we introduce gKNN, a geographically informed kNN variant that blends socioeconomic and spatial distances and exposes donor contributions, enabling provenance-based visual accountability by showing which regions drive each estimate. Our primary contribution is a method-agnostic visual analytics environment that makes cross-method comparison a first-class visual task and integrates gKNN alongside standard methods. Coordinated views reveal missingness structure through heatmaps, co-missingness summaries, and distributional diagnostics that help analysts reason about missingness patterns (MCAR/MAR) and cases where missingness may be non-random (MNAR). Users can compare and tune models and interrogate results via distributional overlays, a Method Comparison Summary reporting MAE, RMSE, Delta RMSE, and runtime for each algorithm on the current target and mask, along with variable-level discrepancy views. Cached per-method results and locked axis scales reduce cognitive overhead from shifting ranges during method switching. These comparisons highlight where methods disagree, which variables are sensitive, and how imputation choices affect downstream summaries. Case studies demonstrate how ImputeViz helps analysts select effective strategies, surface sensitive variables, and assess model robustness.
